我去年写的总结-谈谈对产品经理的认识A Summary I Wrote Last Year: My Understanding of Product Managers
我去年写的总结-谈谈对产品经理的认识
看了周鸿祎谈产品经理、产品、用户体验等方面的文章(《像怀胎一样怀产品,需格外注意的五点用户体验》等)很受启发,但同时又感觉有些意犹未尽。什么是产品经理?产品经理的职责是什么?真正的产品经理应该具备什么样的能力和素养?在网上(知乎上的)查找了一些资料并结合自己的实际工作体会,试着对这些问题做一下回答。
到底什么是产品经理?这个职位的主要职责是什么?在IT产业的不同领域,甚至在同一领域的不同公司,这个职位的定义似乎都有不同。虽然在不同的公司,产品经理的角色和职责互有差异,但是有一些关键职责是任何一个产品经理都应承担的。可以将其归纳为如下六个方面:
1、市场调研
市场调研是指研究市场以了解客户需求、竞争状况及市场力量,其最终目标是发现创新或改进产品的潜在机会。
可以通过下面的方式进行市场调研:
- 与用户和潜在用户交流
- 与直接面对客户的一线同事如销售、客服、技术支持等交流
- 研究市场分析报告及文章
- 试用竞争产品
- 仔细观察用户行为等
- 市场调研最终会形成商业机会、产品战略或商业需求文档(BRD),详述如何利用潜在的机会。
个人体会(知乎上找到的):
这里面最为关键的点是如何找到真需求(刚性需求),避免陷入弱需求、伪需求的陷阱里。如何找到?1,把自己当成小白用户,站在用户角度,忘记自己的经验和技术。 2,学会提问题:需求是从哪里来的?目标客户是谁? 有多少人有这样的需求?这个需求紧迫吗?他们的痛点是什么?场景是什么(用产品之前/之后)?需求满足之后数据和指标上会有什么表现?
2、产品定义及设计
a) 产品定义是指确定产品需要做哪些事情。通常采用产品需求文档(PRD)来进行描述,PRD可能包含如下信息:
- 产品的愿景
- 目标市场
- 竞争分析
- 产品功能的详细描述
- 产品功能的优先级
- 产品用例(UseCase)
- 系统需求
- 性能需求
- 销售及支持需求等
b) 产品设计是指确定产品的外观,包括用户界面设计(UI,User Interface)和用户交互设计(User Interaction),包含所有的用户体验部分。在大型公司里,产品经理通常和UI设计师或互动设计师一起完成产品设计,不过在小公司或者创业公司里,产品经理也许需要全包这些工作。
这是产品经理工作中最有价值的部分, 如果产品经理工作中不包含这部分内容,那几乎可以肯定说,那不是产品经理的工作。
个人体会:产品需求文档主要是给研发部门的同事看的,那么编写的时候要有针对性。尽量要用研发看得懂的语言来描述,什么是研发看得懂的语言?我称之为MVC模式语言。
M就是Model(模型),一个功能包含哪些数据,信息域,要交代清楚,尽量清晰明确。C就是Control(控制),要把一个功能一个业务的流程描述清楚,第一步是什么第二步是什么,每一步流程都涉及哪些角色。V就是View(视图),在必要的时候,需要把需求的界面描述清楚,这个功能的界面是长什么样的,用图画的形式,描述清楚。
需求描述的粗细要有一个取舍,不能太粗,研发看不懂。也不能太细,容易限制研发的思维。
3、项目管理
项目管理是指带领来自不同团队的人员(包括工程师、QA、UI设计师、市场、销售、客服等),在预算内按时开发并发布产品。其中可能包括如下工作内容:
- 确保资源投入
- 制定项目计划
- 根据计划跟踪项目进展
- 辨别关键路径
- 必要时争取追加投入
- 向主管领导报告项目进展状况等
- 在大型公司里,通常会有项目经理来处理大部分项目管理工作,产品经理只需提供支持。不过在创业公司里,产品经理通常需要自己进行项目管理。在有些公司,技术负责人也可能做为项目经理,处理大部分项目管理事宜。
个人体会(知乎上找到的):作为产品经理,你的决策你的项目行为都是为了让项目按时按量更好更快完成。 针对团队管理总结几点:
1, 尽量深入的了解上下游相关岗位的专业知识,
2,给团队成员足够的信息和空间。
3,勇于沟通和学习,不耻下问。
4,小心处理需求变更。
5,多表扬称赞同事。
6,勇于担当。
产品经理如何使自己的观点有说服力,让技术人员觉得你说得有道理,愿意按你说的做?说服他人,特别是研发、设计、前端这些研发部门的同事,最重要的不是口才、沟通能力和数据,而是专业。专业就是:第一,你要用内行的思维方式、表达方式和处理方式来思考、沟通和执行;第二,你要经常可以做出正确的决定。一个人要先相信你能说出正确的话,才有可能认真去听你说的内容,进而才有可能认可你的话。通常人们认为只有内行才有可能说出正确的话来,而外行只能瞎指挥。所以产品经理要时时刻刻表现的很内行,很专业。有些产品经理很苦恼:我明明说的是对的,为什么研发人员听不进去?是的,你说的可能是对的,但是由于你平时的表现让研发人员觉得你很外行,他们根本就没有认真听你在说什么。只有尽量多、尽量深入的了解上下游相关岗位的专业知识,并且有一定的实践经验,才能让我们显得专业。在与相关岗位的沟通中,获得对方的信任感,进而采纳我们的意见。有几个小技巧可以介绍一下,不过在看这些技巧之前,必须重申一遍:让自己变得专业的根本办法是自己要尽量多的了解各个岗位的专业知识,小技巧只是一种手段,不要幻想着只凭借技巧就能真正的专业起来。
技巧1:尽量说术语。
技巧2:思维要周密,在说话之前要尽量把所有可能的情况及其解决方案想清楚。
技巧3:让对方自己得出结论。
技巧4:看人下菜碟。不是对每个都用同样的话说服的,人和人都有所不同。对待工程师、设计师、老板是不同的。
技巧5:人格魅力。做人要有幽默感,要学会缓和气氛。没必要每次需求讨论的时候都板着脸训人。说说笑话,插科打诨,给设计师倒杯水,给工程锤锤肩,送给运营的小姑娘几块儿巧克力,给运维的同事买几瓶水。平时这么注重积累,在你需要的时候别人自然不会为难你。能做的就做了,不能做的睁一眼闭一眼也就做了。
所有的技巧都是一种手段,真才实干才是王道。
4、产品宣介
主要包括和内部同事如老板、销售、市场、客服等沟通产品的优点、功能和目标市场,也可能包括向外界如媒体、行业分析师及用户宣介产品。
大公司的产品经理通常都有产品市场、市场推广和媒体关系(PR)团队帮忙进行对外的产品宣介。
这是除了产品定义和设计之外,对产品经理而言价值第二高的工作,尤其是在向老板、市场同事宣介产品并让他们感到兴奋的时候。
5、产品市场
主要是对外的信息传播——告诉外界有关产品的信息。通常包括制作产品数据表、手册、网站、Flash演示、媒体专题以及展会演示等。
在大型公司,产品市场工作通常不会由产品经理来负责,这些公司会有专门的产品市场经理来打理此项工作。当然,这种分工最大的缺点就是导致沟通效率较低,并会削弱对外传播。
在某些公司,“产品管理”和“产品市场”被认为是同义词,会由一个人担当两者的职责。而在那些将产品管理团队和产品市场团队分开的公司,后者会打理本节所提及的工作职责,同时他们也可能会承担“市场调研”、“产品宣介”和“产品生命周期”管理的部分工作。
6、产品生命周期管理
指那些随着产品经历概念化->发布->成熟->退出市场整个生命周期中的产品管理活动。
主要包括的工作有:
- 产品定位
- 产品定价及促销
- 产品线管理
- 竞争策略
- 建立或收购合作伙伴
- 识别并建立合作关系等
- 产品经理和产品市场、BD及市场沟通同事一起完成这些工作。
如何才能成为一个合格的产品经理?产品经理需要具备哪些素质?产品经理需要具备三个核心素质:个人素质、知识管理素质、核心能力素质.
个人素质:
产品管理这个工作具有一定的特殊性,因此,在所有采用了产品管理体系的企业中,无一例外地对产品经理这个具体的”人”有了比其他岗位更为严格的素质和修养方面的要求,具体来说,有5个方面:
个人修养
创新能力
沟通协调能力
自我管理能力
工作压力承受能力
这是一个产品经理所应具备的基本素质,如果不具备这些基本素质,即使其他能力再好,也会影响自己成为一个优秀的产品经理。在这5个能力中,有些是耳熟能详的,例如沟通能力、工作压力承受能力等。这里重点说一下可能会忽视的方面。
个人修养
个人修养的好坏是一个人成熟与否的表现,修养的最高表现,按照古话,应该是”宠辱不惊”,产品经理的工作具有两个特点:
1)权责不对等;
2)时刻依靠团队。
这种看起来自相矛盾的定位,决定了产品经理必须具有非常好的个人修养才可以。比方说,当研发团队因为某些原因对你提出的要求敷衍或者拖沓的时候,你该怎么做呢?是质问、投诉,还是愤怒?我相信,出现这种情况的时候,如果你不是产品经理,做出以上任何反应都是很正常的,但是作为产品经理,你如果做出这些反应,不但对你的工作无益,反而会影响你在产品团队中的威信和声望。建议的做法是”站在产品项目的大局上,用客观的数据来进行说明,并指出敷衍的后果”,让对方去判断应该如何去做,而不是你去告诉他们怎么去做。这样,就会让对方感到,你和他们是一体的,是一个团队,你相信他们做出的任何决定,是尊重他们的。因此,在产品管理工作中,个人修养的最核心表现就是”尊重团队中的每个人,相信团队中的每个人”。
创新意识
创新能力的强弱决定了一个企业在竞争中持久能力的高低。
现在,无论是国家还是企业都在提创新,但是,在现实中,则始终没有提出一个创新的主导群体,在企业中,创新的主导群体非产品经理莫属。
这是由两个方面的因素决定的。
1)市场环境:现在的市场竞争本质就是企业综合资源的竞争,但是,企业有限的资源决定了企业必须开展”以市场为导向”的产品生产才可以,因此,从这个角度来说,产品创新的本质上就是对用户需求的创造性满足。
这个满足需求的过程,肯定是由产品经理来主导的。
2)职责定位:产品经理工作的根本目的,说白了就是”让企业持久赢利”,所有的工作都是据此展开的。持久赢利靠的是什么?靠的就是对用户需求的最大满足,在企业中,谁是对用户需求最了解的?唯有产品经理。
因此,企业的发展靠创新,创新的主导靠产品经理,创新的方向不可脱离市场的需求,企业的发展必须依赖产品的创新,这是相辅相成的,而产品经理作为企业和客户的桥梁,其作用可想而知。
沟通能力
沟通分为语言沟通能力和书面沟通能力。
略。
抗压能力
略。
自管能力
必须承认,产品经理的工作过于烦琐和多样,甚至会有许多和自身工作无关的事务来干扰自己的正常工作,这个时候,自我管理能力的高低就会直接影响到个人工作的成效。换句话说,就是产品经理在日常工作中能否承受得住各种各样的影响而不会偏离方向。
计划的实现根本在于方向的不偏离和坚持,而个人能力的高低其实并不起到决定作用,在产品经理的日常工作中,其实就是”一个计划接着另一个计划”的制 订、执行、验证、修正和制订新的计划,而在这日复一日的工作中,各种影响随处可见,作为产品经理,你能保证每天知道”说什么、做什么、怎么做”吗?
这就是自我管理能力,简单地说,就是要求产品经理”该想的想,该说的说,该做的做”。
知识管理素质
随着市场环境的变化,产品管理逐步成为一门新的管理学科,在这个逐渐形成的过程中,融入了其他学科的许多有价值的思想,对于产品经理来说,在职业技能上,除了本身的产品管理技能外,还要学习许多交互学科的管理知识才可以。
因此,现在的产品经理已经被赋予了新的内涵,越来越多的企业开始期望产品经理能够担当更大更多的责任,这种期望就要求产品经理必须具备全面的管理知识,否则,“没有权利的小CEO”将永远不可能成为”真正的CEO”。
产品经理需要具备的管理知识重点应该包括:
战略管理知识
项目管理知识
时间管理知识
团队管理知识
这四项管理知识和每个产品经理都息息相关。或许这四项管理知识不会直接影响到具体的工作,但是,它们会通过影响产品管理技能而影响具体的工作,因此,这四种知识是否具备将会间接影响到本职工作。
战略管理知识
许多产品经理可能知道一年内要做什么,但是,如果问到”你知道3~5年内要做什么吗?“我想,所有的产品经理几乎都会摇头,并且会说”那不是我要考虑的”,那么,什么才是你要考虑的呢?
需求分析?产品定义?还是销售支持?没错,这些都是你该考虑的事情,但是,即使把这些都做得非常好了,在这些方面的能力也都非常强了,你充其量还是一个”将才”,而不是”帅才”。
为什么这么说呢?
首先,“战略”是什么?简单说,战略就是”方针”,就是”方向”,就是”思想”,具体到产品管理工作中,就是说,作为产品经理,你是否对产品的长期发展有足够的思考,是否知道5年内产品的走向,是否对5年内的问题和机会有一个预判。
我们通常会感觉战略是很大、很远、很泛甚至很空的东西,但是你必须承认,它是指导你进行每一步工作的基础,而作为产品经理,无论在现实工作中是否去做战略规划的工作(真正的产品经理是必须去为企业做产品战略规划的),都必须具备这样的知识。
项目管理知识
产品从过程上看,其实就是由一个项目阶段加一个项目阶段组成的,也就是说,产品经理负责的是过程,这个过程在开始之前是无法用时间来界定起始的,而项目管理者负责的是阶段,阶段则是可以在开始之前就界定出起始来的。
由此可以看出,作为产品经理,在产品管理工作中,如果用”天”来作为工作计时单位,其实每天的工作就泡在某个具体阶段的项目中。
做市场调查,对于市场部门来说是一个项目,需求定义,对于产品部门来说是一个项目,产品研发对于研发部门来说,同样是一个项目,就是这样众多的大大小小具体的项目构成了一个产品项目,而多个产品项目则构成了产品过程。
因此,从这个角度来说,产品经理其实在做着一个”知头不知尾”的特殊项目,而项目管理中需要的各种知识和技能同样适用于此,主要包括:
制订项目计划
评估项目风险
争取项目资源
管理项目团队
协调项目问题
控制项目进度
……
因此,产品经理熟练掌握一些项目管理的知识和技能,首先对现实的工作有着非常积极的作用。
时间管理知识
可以这么说,产品经理的工作除了做必要的产品战略、产品规划外,几乎都是被大量的和产品有关的战术性工作所充斥,但是,一个人的时间和精力是有限的,如何在有限的时间内尽量多地完成这些工作,就涉及时间管理的知识和技能。
在时间管理中,有两个最重要的概念:效率和效果。
效率是指能够产出、不会浪费时间的能力;效果则是指能够针对正确的事情排序,以及进行工作的品质。
也可以这么说,时间管理的目标就是在”效率”和”效果”上达到最适合的平衡。
现在几乎所有的产品经理都在扮演”消防员”的角色,到处救”产品的火”,一天下来,累得要死,但是效果却不尽如人意,还往往把重要的事放在了一边,被高层认为是”既没有效率,又没有效果”。
要改变这种情况,强大的时间管理技能是必不可少的。
团队管理知识
产品经理通过他人来完成绩效,这一点毋庸置疑,这里的”他人”就包括了所有和产品过程有关的业务部门,通常会包括市场部门、技术部门、生产部门和销售部门。
可以想象,管理这种具备了职能和业务双重角色的团队对于产品经理来说是多么大的挑战。
而恰恰在这个团队中,产品经理又没有相应的管理权力,如何管好这个团队,肯定是最大的问题,产品经理是否具备必要的团队管理技巧,直接决定了产品产出的质量。
因此,在没有直接管理权利的前提下管理好这个产品团队,没有优秀的团队管理能力是根本无法胜任的。
核心能力素质
产品经理的核心知识是什么?毫无疑问,自然是产品管理的知识和能力了。
那么,产品经理应该掌握哪些知识呢?关于产品经理应该掌握的核心知识,包括五个方面,
产品规范管理
产品需求管理
产品项目管理
产品周期管理
产品品牌管理
产品规范管理
首先解释两个概念,产品标准和产品规范。标准和规范的最大区别就是,标准是由官方制定,并且具有一方强制性的约束条件,而规范则是由民间制定,不具有约束性的自我遵守的条件。具体到产品标准和产品规范上,可以这样理解:
产品标准通常会在产品信息上有明显说明,例如国家标准(GB),卫生标准,质量安全(QS)等,这些都是要强制执行,并且由专门的国家机关来管理的,企业只是执行方而已,并且这些标准通常不被用户所熟知。
产品规范则通常采用直观的形式加以说明,例如瓶装水,容量就完全由企业来决定,可以有600ml,550ml,595ml等多种容量规格,也可 以在瓶口直径上有自己的规格,例如有2.5cm,2cm等规格,这些规范对于企业来说没有强制性的要求,完全由企业自行管理,通常规范的制定是来源于大多 数用户的需求,同时,企业也会主动来增加一些产品规范来进行用户引导。并且这种规范通常会被用户所熟知。
由此可以看出,产品规范是任何产品都不可或缺的一种信息,同时,随着产品多样化的不断发展,产品规范会越来越丰富,也逐渐成为企业的一种营销手段,在此情况下,企业就必须有专人来对这些产品规范进行管理,这个责任自然而然就落到了产品经理身上。
产品需求管理
我们谈需求谈的太多了,但是却很少有人从产品管理的角度去谈到底什么是产品经理应该关注的需求。
很多对于需求的理解都是基于传统的产品本身甚至是开发层面的,这些需求是不是产品经理应该关注的呢,没错,确实是应该产品经理关注的,但是如果只去关注这些需求,只能让产品经理对需求的管理产生片面的理解。
需求的第一级别:商业需求。针对这个需求,你要明白企业想通过这个产品实现什么,是为了更好的实现企业的战略目标甚至是愿景,还是希望通过这个产品增加营收,或是延伸现有的产品线,开拓一个新的市场,甚至就是纯粹的资本运作,为获得融资以及可能的IPO服务。
清晰了这个商业层面的需求,接下来你就应该知道如何来规划这个产品了,这就是业务需求,业务需求要实现的就是如何来规划这个产品从而更好的有助于实现企业的商业上的期望。
比方说如果企业的商业需求是为了开拓一个新的市场,那么,这个需求针对的业务需求就是要求你考虑和规划能够实现这个目标的产品方向和战略。
你或许需要考虑如果达到既定的市场目标,可能需要5年的时间,那么,在这5年当中,你需要对产品进行什么样的规划,公司需要的投入都有哪些以及数量,每个阶段的产品目标都是什么,目标之间应该存在什么样的关系等等。
这些考虑到位了,接下来的就是按照既定的计划来设计要实现相应目标的产品,比方说第一年的目标是让潜在用户对新产品有一个大致的认识,在市场上树立一个品牌,公司的相关投入也只是尝试性的,那么,你在具体的工作中就需要围绕这个目标来开展,比方说对于产品的功能性需求的满足就会缩减,可能只需要 实现基础功能(按照对功能的分类,可以分为基础功能、延伸功能、增值功能)就可以了,因为公司的投入是尝试的,并且其目标主要是为了树立品牌和建立潜 在用户的认知,因此,更多的投入不会在产品本身上,而是在推广和营销以及相关事务的建设上,比方说新渠道的构建等。
接下来就是项目需求,因为要实现业务需求,肯定是需要一项一项的工作来完成的,而这一项一项的工作对于产品经理来说,则是一个个具体的项目。
其实对于产品经理来说,关注的需求到这里就可以了,当然,再往下,还可以细分出更多的需求,基于项目需求,还会有产品具体版本的需求,基于版本需求,还会有开发层面的需求,这些在产品管理中,其实并不需要是作为重点的。
按照产品管理规范的流程,产品经理在完成MRD和PRD后,需求的工作其实是可以告一段落了。
这里再强调一点,我们通常所说的“用户需求”、“市场需求”什么的,其实都是包含于以上三种需求中。
原因很简单,一个产品其实是承载了企业和用户两方面的诉求在里面的,我们要做的就是能够把这两类诉求统一起来,用一个产品来满足双方的期望和目标。
而商业需求、业务需求、项目需求则可以把这两类需求同时让产品经理关注起来。
这其实是产品管理的目的所要求的,产品管理的目的就是“保证企业的竞争优势和客户的长期满意度”。
明白了这点,其实就明白了我们如何做好需求管理了。
产品项目管理
掌握项目管理的知识是完全从项目管理的角度来看的,也就是说,我们必须学习项目管理的知识,而产品项目管理则是完全从产品管理的角度来看的,也就是说,这个知识指的是要用从项目管理中学习到的知识来指导产品管理中的具体工作。
产品周期管理
这里没有说是产品生命周期管理,因为按照通常的理解,产品生命周期是指“一种产品在市场上出现、发展到最后被淘汰的过程,它是产品的一种更新换代的经济现象”。
也就是说,一个产品的生命周期是以这个产品的上市为开始,退市为结束的,但是对于产品经理来说,现实的情况却不仅仅于此,要做的工作不但包括上 市到退市这个过程,而且还包括前期的很多工作,也就是说,产品管理过程不仅仅限于产品生命周期管理,产品生命周期管理只不过是产品经理的一个阶段工作而 已。
这样说,似乎还是有些过于学术,简单点,产品周期管理包括什么,两个阶段:
(1)做产品的阶段;(2)卖产品的阶段。
而做产品的阶段包含了产品项目管理中的大部分工作(除市场化以外的工作),卖产品的阶段则是战术活动中市场化的工作。
那为什么我们提产品生命周期管理比较多呢?
这是因为产品生命周期管理是产品周期管理中实现市场价值交换的阶段,现实的说,这个阶段对企业来说是最具吸引力和诱惑的,毕竟是要实现收入的过程,因此,这就造成了企业非常重视这个阶段的工作。
大家可以想想,企业现在非常重视的营销、推广、各种促销、各种策划等等,不都是处于产品生命周期管理这个阶段中的吗。
除了这个原因,还有就是国内的企业一直以来还是以“销售为导向”进行生产,对于前期的战略和规划并不是很重视,认为只要营销做得好,没有产品卖不好,基于这样一个思路,肯定不会有一个整体和长远的考虑的。
但是市场是要发展的,以销售为导向的生产必然要被以市场为导向的生产所取代,这是一种必然的趋势,因此,企业肯定会逐步重视起前期的工作来,而我们这些产品经理需要做的就是做好这个准备,储备好必要的知识和技能,要最终做到召之即来,来之能战,战之能胜!
这里只简单说一下,大家只需要知道产品周期>产品生命周期就可以了,做产品经理的,不但要懂如何卖好产品,还要懂如何才能做好产品,我们 常说“适销对路”,其实在我看来,应该是“对路适销”才对,因为“对路”是前提,也就是把产品做好了,而“适销”是结果,也就是把产品卖好了。
这样理解就更简单了,产品经理,无非就是把这两个工作做好,但是想做好,那是需要下大力气的。
产品品牌管理
自从08年的金融危机以及国家提出产业升级后,各类媒体以及很多原来是做代工的企业都在强调一个理念,就是要走创立品牌的道路。
有这个理念是好的,但是从想法到实践再到达到目标,这中间要经历的各种风险和成本是否这些企业已经做好了必要的心理准备。
从企业的角度看,品牌是一种以产品介质为基础的符号,从用户的角度看,品牌则是用户对产品的一种情感认同,从一个冷冰冰的符号变为用户心理层面的一种价值,大家可以想想有多么难吧。
但品牌的创建就是这么简单吗?
自然不是了,创建品牌几乎和规划一个产品是一样困难的。
比方说,就拿最简单的设计品牌名称来说吧,一个名称可不是坐到办公室里就能琢磨出来的,同样需要做很多分析才行的。
首先你要确定你的目标用户,因为目标用户的特征会影响他们对你的品牌的认知和接受度,例如,如果你的产品的目标用户是生活在农村的中老年人,那么,你在设计品牌名称的时候,就肯定不能过于复杂和洋化,最好是一个符合农村文化特征的牌子,还得简单好懂易传播。
其次,在确定了名称后,还要考虑配套的logo,slogan,传播途径,传播形式,以及如何和竞争者的品牌有所差异,以及在品牌推出后,如何评估品牌的效果等等。
这里面涉及到哪些工作了呢?
至少包括市场细分、目标客户确定、竞争格局分析(品牌层面的)、产品品牌创意、差异性分析、营销策略制定(品牌层面的)、推广方案制定、广告设计、传播渠道设计等等,至于后期的品牌维护则又是一个大头的工作。
由此可以看出,做品牌管理不是简单的设计个品牌,制作个广告,媒体上一放就可以了,同样需要大量细致的工作去支撑。
当然,产品经理不可能,也没有必要把上面的工作一一做到,很多工作还是需要团队去配合的,但是产品经理在品牌管理中至少应该向企业和团队说明:
(1)我们的品牌要传播给谁
(2)我们的品牌如何才能与竞争者有所差异
(3)我们品牌要传递什么信息(质量?服务?价格?心理满足?自我实现?)给目标用户
(4)我们的品牌如何才能传递到位
(5)如何评估品牌的传播效果
(6)如何维护我们的品牌不受到侵害
这还仅仅是针对一个新品牌诞生要做的工作,如果是对已有品牌进行管理,那工作也是不少的,比方说,现在推出了一个新产品,你就要考虑现有的产品 品牌是否能够支撑这个新产品的发展,如果能够,那么应该如何来延伸现有的品牌,如果不能,是否需要重新设计一个新品牌,此外,如果企业已经有了多级的品牌,还要考虑延伸或者新的品牌和不同级别品牌之间应该是一种什么样的关系才会是促进和和谐的关系,而不是影响的关系。
这都是产品经理的品牌管理工作应该要做的。
最后,产品经理为什么要去做品牌管理的工作呢?
其实就是一点,我们做产品,其实就是对企业的资源进行管理,而品牌作为产品不可缺失一种企业资源(在国外,品牌是作为一种战略资源存在的),自然要成为我们关注和管理好的一个重要方面。
A Summary I Wrote Last Year: My Understanding of Product Managers
After reading Zhou Hongyi’s articles on product managers, products, and user experience (“Carrying a Product Like Carrying a Child: Five User Experience Points That Demand Special Attention,” among others), I was quite inspired, yet at the same time felt they left something unsaid. What is a product manager? What are a product manager’s responsibilities? What abilities and qualities should a real product manager possess? I looked up some material online (on Zhihu), combined it with my own experience at work, and tried to answer these questions.
So what exactly is a product manager? What are the main responsibilities of this position? Across different corners of the IT industry, and even at different companies within the same field, the definition of this role seems to vary. Although the product manager’s role and duties differ from company to company, there are certain key responsibilities that every product manager should shoulder. They can be summed up in the following six areas:
- Market Research
Market research means studying the market to understand customer needs, the competitive landscape, and market forces; its ultimate goal is to uncover potential opportunities to innovate or improve the product.
Market research can be carried out in the following ways:
-
Talking with users and potential users
-
Talking with frontline colleagues who face customers directly, such as sales, customer service, and technical support
-
Studying market analysis reports and articles
-
Trying out competing products
-
Closely observing user behavior, and so on
-
Market research ultimately takes shape as a business opportunity, a product strategy, or a business requirements document (BRD), detailing how to seize the potential opportunity.
Personal takeaway (found on Zhihu):
The most critical point here is how to find real needs (hard needs) and avoid falling into the trap of weak or false ones. How? 1. Treat yourself as a novice user, stand in the user’s shoes, and forget your own experience and technical knowledge. 2. Learn to ask questions: Where does the need come from? Who is the target customer? How many people have this need? Is it urgent? What are their pain points? What is the scenario (before/after using the product)? Once the need is met, how will it show up in the data and metrics?
- Product Definition and Design
a) Product definition means determining what the product needs to do. It is usually described in a product requirements document (PRD), which may contain the following information:
-
The product vision
-
Target market
-
Competitive analysis
-
Detailed descriptions of product features
-
Feature priorities
-
Product use cases (UseCase)
-
System requirements
-
Performance requirements
-
Sales and support requirements, and so on
b) Product design means determining what the product looks like, including user interface design (UI, User Interface) and user interaction design (User Interaction), covering everything that makes up the user experience. At large companies, product managers usually complete product design together with UI designers or interaction designers, but at small companies or startups, the product manager may need to take on all of this work alone.
This is the most valuable part of a product manager’s work. If a job does not include this part, you can say with near certainty that it is not a product manager’s job.
Personal takeaway: the product requirements document is written mainly for colleagues in engineering, so write it with that audience in mind. Describe things, as far as possible, in language engineers can understand. What counts as language engineers can understand? I call it MVC-pattern language.
M is the Model: spell out what data and information domains a feature involves, as clearly and precisely as you can. C is Control: describe the flow of a feature or a business process clearly, what step one is, what step two is, and which roles each step involves. V is the View: when necessary, describe the interface the requirement calls for, what the screen for this feature looks like, and make it clear in the form of drawings.
The granularity of requirement descriptions calls for a trade-off: not too coarse, or engineers won’t understand; not too fine either, or you risk boxing in their thinking.
- Project Management
Project management means leading people from different teams (including engineers, QA, UI designers, marketing, sales, customer service, and so on) to develop and release the product on time and within budget. This may include the following work:
-
Securing resource commitments
-
Drawing up the project plan
-
Tracking progress against the plan
-
Identifying the critical path
-
Fighting for additional investment when necessary
-
Reporting project status to supervising leaders, and so on
-
At large companies there is usually a project manager to handle most project management work, and the product manager only needs to provide support. At startups, however, the product manager usually has to do the project management personally. At some companies, the technical lead may also act as project manager and handle most project management matters.
Personal takeaway (found on Zhihu): as a product manager, your decisions and your actions on a project all serve one purpose, getting the project done on time and in full, better and faster. A few points on team management:
-
Get to know, as deeply as you can, the specialized knowledge of upstream and downstream roles,
-
Give team members enough information and enough room.
-
Communicate and learn boldly; never be ashamed to ask.
-
Handle requirement changes with care.
-
Praise and compliment colleagues often.
-
Dare to take responsibility.
How does a product manager make their views persuasive, so that technical people feel you are talking sense and are willing to do as you say? To persuade others, especially colleagues in engineering, design, and frontend, the most important thing is not eloquence, communication skills, or data, but professionalism. Professionalism means: first, you think, communicate, and execute with an insider’s ways of thinking, expressing, and handling things; second, you can regularly make the right calls. A person has to believe first that you are capable of saying the right things before they will listen carefully to what you say, and only then might they come to accept it. People generally assume that only insiders can say the right things, while outsiders can only give blind orders. So a product manager must come across as an insider, as a professional, at every moment. Some product managers agonize: what I said was clearly right, so why won’t the engineers listen? Yes, you may well be right, but your everyday performance has convinced the engineers you are an amateur, and they never seriously listened to what you were saying in the first place. Only by learning the specialized knowledge of upstream and downstream roles as broadly and deeply as possible, backed by a certain amount of hands-on experience, can we appear professional; then, in communicating with those roles, we earn their trust, and in turn they adopt our opinions. There are a few small tricks worth sharing, but before reading them, this must be restated: the fundamental way to become professional is to learn as much as you can about each role’s specialized knowledge. Tricks are only a device; do not fantasize that tricks alone will ever make you truly professional.
Trick 1: Use the jargon whenever you can.
Trick 2: Think rigorously; before you speak, try to work through every possible scenario and its solution.
Trick 3: Let the other person reach the conclusion themselves.
Trick 4: Tailor the dish to the diner. You do not persuade everyone with the same words; people differ. You treat engineers, designers, and the boss differently.
Trick 5: Personal charm. Have a sense of humor; learn to lighten the mood. There is no need to wear a stern face and lecture people at every requirements discussion. Crack a joke, clown around a little, pour the designer a glass of water, knead the engineer’s shoulders, hand the girls in operations a few pieces of chocolate, buy the ops colleagues a few bottles of water. Build up goodwill like this day to day, and when you need something, people naturally won’t make things hard for you. What can be done gets done; what can’t be done gets done anyway, with one eye closed.
All tricks are merely devices; real ability and real work are what reign supreme.
- Product Evangelism
This mainly involves communicating the product’s strengths, features, and target market to internal colleagues such as the boss, sales, marketing, and customer service; it may also involve presenting the product to the outside world, such as the media, industry analysts, and users.
Product managers at big companies usually have product marketing, promotion, and media relations (PR) teams to help with external product evangelism.
After product definition and design, this is the second most valuable part of a product manager’s work, especially when you present the product to the boss and to marketing colleagues and get them genuinely excited.
- Product Marketing
This is mainly outward communication: telling the outside world about the product. It usually includes producing product data sheets, brochures, websites, Flash demos, media features, and trade show demonstrations.
At large companies, product marketing is usually not the product manager’s responsibility; these companies have dedicated product marketing managers to handle it. Of course, the biggest drawback of this division of labor is lower communication efficiency, and it weakens outward messaging.
At some companies, “product management” and “product marketing” are treated as synonyms, with one person carrying both sets of duties. At companies that separate the product management team from the product marketing team, the latter handles the duties described in this section, and they may also take on part of the work of market research, product evangelism, and product life cycle management.
- Product Life Cycle Management
This refers to the product management activities that accompany the product through its entire life cycle: conception -> launch -> maturity -> withdrawal from the market.
The main work includes:
-
Product positioning
-
Product pricing and promotions
-
Product line management
-
Competitive strategy
-
Building or acquiring partners
-
Identifying and establishing partnerships, and so on
-
The product manager completes this work together with colleagues in product marketing, BD, and marketing communications.
How do you become a qualified product manager? What qualities does a product manager need? A product manager needs three core sets of qualities: personal qualities, knowledge management qualities, and core competency qualities.
Personal qualities:
Product management is a rather particular line of work. As a result, every company that has adopted a product management system, without exception, holds the specific “person” of the product manager to stricter requirements of quality and character than any other position. Specifically, there are five areas:
Personal cultivation
Capacity for innovation
Communication and coordination skills
Self-management skills
Ability to withstand work pressure
These are the basic qualities a product manager should possess. Without them, however strong your other abilities, they will hold you back from becoming an excellent product manager. Among these five, some are familiar to everyone, such as communication skills and the ability to withstand pressure. Here I want to focus on the aspects that tend to be overlooked.
Personal cultivation
The quality of one’s personal cultivation shows how mature a person is. Its highest expression, in the words of the old saying, is to be “unmoved by favor or disgrace.” The product manager’s work has two characteristics:
-
Authority and responsibility are mismatched;
-
You depend on the team at every moment.
This seemingly self-contradictory position means a product manager simply must have very good personal cultivation. Say the engineering team, for whatever reason, brushes off or drags its feet on a request you raised. What do you do? Interrogate them, file a complaint, or get angry? I believe that in such a situation, if you were not the product manager, any of those reactions would be perfectly normal. But as the product manager, reacting that way does your work no good and instead erodes your authority and standing within the product team. The recommended approach is to “stand on the larger interests of the product project, explain with objective data, and point out the consequences of the foot-dragging,” letting the other side judge what they should do rather than you telling them what to do. That way, they feel that you and they are one body, one team, that you trust whatever decision they make, that you respect them. So in product management work, the very core of personal cultivation is to “respect every person on the team, trust every person on the team.”
A sense of innovation
The strength of a company’s capacity for innovation determines how long it can endure in competition.
Nowadays both the state and companies talk about innovation, yet in reality no one has ever named a group to lead it. Within a company, the group that leads innovation can be none other than the product managers.
Two factors determine this.
- The market environment: competition in today’s market is in essence a competition of a company’s overall resources. But a company’s limited resources dictate that it must produce products in a “market-oriented” way. From this angle, product innovation is in essence the creative satisfaction of user needs.
And this process of satisfying needs is, without question, led by the product manager.
- The definition of the role: the fundamental purpose of a product manager’s work, to put it bluntly, is “to keep the company profitable over the long run,” and all the work unfolds from there. What does lasting profit rest on? On satisfying user needs to the greatest degree. And within the company, who understands user needs best? Only the product manager.
So a company’s growth rests on innovation, innovation is led by product managers, the direction of innovation must not stray from market demand, and the company’s growth must depend on product innovation: each reinforces the other. As the bridge between company and customer, the product manager’s importance goes without saying.
Communication skills
Communication divides into verbal communication and written communication.
Omitted.
Resilience under pressure
Omitted.
Self-management
It has to be admitted that a product manager’s work is excessively tedious and varied; plenty of matters that have nothing to do with your own job will come along to disrupt your normal work. At times like these, your level of self-management directly affects how effective you are. In other words, it is a question of whether a product manager can withstand influences of every kind in daily work without drifting off course.
Fulfilling a plan comes down to holding the direction and persevering; the level of one’s personal ability is not actually decisive. A product manager’s daily work is really “one plan after another”: drafting, executing, verifying, correcting, and drafting the next one. And in this day-after-day work, influences of every kind lurk everywhere. As a product manager, can you guarantee that every day you know “what to say, what to do, and how to do it”?
That is self-management. Put simply, it asks the product manager to “think what should be thought, say what should be said, and do what should be done.”
Knowledge management qualities
As the market environment changes, product management is gradually becoming a new management discipline. In the course of taking shape, it has absorbed many valuable ideas from other disciplines. For product managers, this means that professionally, beyond product management skills proper, you also have to learn management knowledge from many neighboring disciplines.
Today’s product manager has thus been given new meaning; more and more companies have begun to expect product managers to shoulder bigger and broader responsibilities. That expectation demands well-rounded management knowledge; otherwise, the “little CEO without power” will never become a “real CEO.”
The management knowledge a product manager needs should center on:
Strategic management
Project management
Time management
Team management
These four areas of management knowledge are intimately relevant to every product manager. Perhaps they do not directly affect the concrete work, but they affect it through their influence on product management skills; whether you possess these four kinds of knowledge will therefore indirectly affect how you do your job.
Strategic management
Many product managers may know what they will be doing within the year. But ask them, “Do you know what you’ll be doing over the next three to five years?” and I suspect nearly every one will shake their head and say, “That’s not for me to think about.” Then what is for you to think about?
Requirements analysis? Product definition? Or sales support? True, these are all things you should think about. But even if you do them all extremely well, even if your abilities there are formidable, you are at best the stuff of a good general, not of a commander-in-chief.
Why say that?
First, what is “strategy”? Simply put, strategy is the “guiding policy,” the “direction,” the “idea.” Applied to product management work, it asks: as a product manager, have you thought enough about the product’s long-term development? Do you know where the product is headed over the next five years? Do you have a forward read on the problems and opportunities of those five years?
We usually feel strategy is something huge, distant, sweeping, even empty. But you have to admit it is the foundation guiding every step of your work. And as a product manager, whether or not your actual job includes strategic planning (a real product manager must do product strategy planning for the company), you must possess this knowledge.
Project management
Seen as a process, a product is really one project phase stacked upon another. That is, the product manager is responsible for the process, and before it begins, that process cannot have its start and end marked out in time; the project manager is responsible for phases, and a phase’s start and end can be marked out before it begins.
From this you can see that in product management work, if you count your working time in “days,” each day is in fact soaked in the project of some concrete phase.
A market survey is a project for the marketing department; requirements definition is a project for the product department; product development is likewise a project for the engineering department. Many concrete projects, large and small, make up a product project, and multiple product projects make up the product process.
From this angle, then, the product manager is really running a peculiar project “whose beginning is known but whose end is not,” and all the knowledge and skills project management demands apply here as well, mainly including:
Drawing up project plans
Assessing project risks
Securing project resources
Managing the project team
Coordinating project issues
Controlling project schedule
…
So a product manager’s solid grasp of some project management knowledge and skills has, first and foremost, a very positive effect on the practical work.
Time management
You could say that apart from the necessary product strategy and product planning, a product manager’s work is almost entirely flooded with tactical, product-related tasks. But one person’s time and energy are finite, and getting as much of this work done as possible within finite time is where the knowledge and skills of time management come in.
In time management there are two most important concepts: efficiency and effectiveness.
Efficiency is the capacity to produce without wasting time; effectiveness is the capacity to put the right things first, and the quality of the work performed.
Put another way, the goal of time management is to strike the most suitable balance between “efficiency” and “effectiveness.”
These days nearly every product manager is playing “firefighter,” rushing around putting out “product fires.” By day’s end they are dead tired, yet the results disappoint, the important things often get shoved aside, and senior leadership concludes they are “neither efficient nor effective.”
To change this, strong time management skills are indispensable.
Team management
A product manager delivers results through other people; there is no question about that. “Other people” here includes every business department tied to the product process, usually marketing, technology, production, and sales.
You can imagine what a challenge it is for a product manager to manage a team that carries this double role of function and business.
And in precisely this team, the product manager holds no corresponding managerial power. How to manage it well is surely the biggest problem, and whether the product manager has the necessary team management skills directly determines the quality of what the product delivers.
So managing this product team well, without direct managerial authority, is simply beyond anyone who lacks excellent team management ability.
Core competency qualities
What is a product manager’s core knowledge? Without a doubt, it is the knowledge and ability of product management itself.
So what knowledge should a product manager master? The core knowledge a product manager should master covers five areas:
Product specification management
Product requirements management
Product project management
Product cycle management
Product brand management
Product specification management
First, two concepts to explain: product standards and product specifications. The biggest difference between a standard and a specification is that a standard is set by the authorities and carries mandatory, binding conditions, while a specification is set privately, a self-observed condition with no binding force. Applied to product standards and product specifications, you can understand it this way:
Product standards are usually stated plainly in the product information, for example national standards (GB), hygiene standards, and quality safety (QS). These are compulsory and administered by dedicated state agencies; the company is merely the executing party, and users are generally not familiar with these standards.
Product specifications are usually conveyed in intuitive form. Take bottled water: the volume is entirely up to the company, which may offer 600ml, 550ml, 595ml, and other volume options, and may set its own specifications for bottle-mouth diameter, say 2.5cm or 2cm. These specifications carry no mandatory requirements for the company and are managed entirely at its own discretion. Usually they originate in the needs of most users, and companies will also take the initiative to add product specifications to guide users. And users generally are familiar with these specifications.
From this you can see that product specifications are a kind of information no product can do without. Meanwhile, as products keep diversifying, specifications grow ever richer and gradually become one of the company’s marketing tools. In that situation the company must have someone dedicated to managing these product specifications, and the responsibility naturally lands on the product manager.
Product requirements management
We talk about requirements far too much, yet very few people talk, from the standpoint of product management, about which requirements a product manager should actually care about.
Much of our understanding of requirements is grounded in the traditional product itself, or even at the development level. Should a product manager care about those requirements? Yes, certainly. But caring only about those gives the product manager a one-sided understanding of requirements management.
The first level of requirements: commercial requirements. For these, you must understand what the company wants to achieve through this product. Is it to better realize the company’s strategic goals or even its vision? To grow revenue through the product? To extend the existing product line, open up a new market, or even purely to work the capital markets, in service of fundraising and a possible IPO?
Once the requirements at this commercial level are clear, you should then know how to plan the product. These are the business requirements: what business requirements aim to achieve is how to plan this product so that it better helps fulfill the company’s commercial expectations.
For example, if the company’s commercial requirement is to open up a new market, then the business requirement matched to it asks you to consider and plan a product direction and strategy capable of reaching that goal.
You may need to consider that reaching the set market goal could take five years. Then, over those five years, how should the product be planned? What investments will the company need, and in what amounts? What is the product goal at each stage, and what relationships should hold between those goals? And so on.
With these thought through, what follows is designing, according to the set plan, the product that will meet the corresponding goals. Say the first year’s goal is to give potential users a rough acquaintance with the new product and to establish a brand in the market, with the company’s investment merely exploratory. Then your concrete work needs to revolve around that goal. For instance, the fulfillment of functional requirements will be pared back; implementing the basic functions may be enough (by classification, functions divide into basic, extended, and value-added), because the company’s investment is exploratory and its goal is mainly to establish the brand and build awareness among potential users. Most of the investment will therefore go not into the product itself but into promotion, marketing, and the building of related affairs, such as constructing new channels.
Next come the project requirements, because fulfilling the business requirements certainly takes work completed piece by piece, and to the product manager, each of those pieces of work is a concrete project.
For the product manager, in truth, attention to requirements can stop here. Of course, going further down, more requirements can be carved out: beneath project requirements there are requirements for specific product versions, and beneath version requirements, requirements at the development level. In product management, these really do not need to be the focus.
Following the standard product management process, once the product manager has finished the MRD and the PRD, the requirements work can in fact be brought to a close.
One more point to stress here: the “user needs” and “market needs” we usually speak of are in fact all contained within the three kinds of requirements above.
The reason is simple: a product actually carries the appeals of both the company and the users. What we must do is unify these two kinds of appeals and satisfy both sides’ expectations and goals with a single product.
And commercial requirements, business requirements, and project requirements let the product manager attend to both kinds at once.
This is really what the purpose of product management demands, for the purpose of product management is “to safeguard the company’s competitive advantage and the customer’s long-term satisfaction.”
Understand this, and you understand how to do requirements management well.
Product project management
Mastering project management knowledge is viewed entirely from the angle of project management; that is, we must learn the knowledge of project management. Product project management, though, is viewed entirely from the angle of product management; that is, this knowledge means using what we have learned from project management to guide the concrete work of product management.
Product cycle management
Note that this does not say product life cycle management, because as commonly understood, the product life cycle refers to “the process by which a product appears on the market, develops, and is finally phased out; it is an economic phenomenon of product succession.”
In other words, a product’s life cycle begins at its launch and ends at its withdrawal. For the product manager, though, reality goes beyond that: the work covers not only the stretch from launch to withdrawal but also a great deal of earlier work. That is to say, the product management process is not limited to product life cycle management; product life cycle management is merely one phase of the product manager’s work.
Put that way it still sounds a bit too academic. More simply, what does product cycle management include? Two stages:
(1) the stage of making the product; (2) the stage of selling the product.
The making stage contains most of the work in product project management (everything except commercialization), while the selling stage is the commercialization work among the tactical activities.
Then why do we talk so much more about product life cycle management?
Because product life cycle management is the stage of product cycle management where market value is exchanged. Realistically speaking, this stage is the most attractive and tempting to the company; it is, after all, the process where revenue is realized, and so companies attach enormous weight to the work of this stage.
Think about it: the marketing, the promotion, all the sales campaigns and schemes that companies now prize so highly, don’t they all sit within this stage of product life cycle management?
Besides this, there is also the fact that domestic companies have all along produced in a “sales-oriented” way, giving little weight to early-stage strategy and planning, believing that with good marketing no product can sell badly. On that line of thinking, there will certainly never be any holistic, long-range consideration.
But markets evolve. Sales-oriented production is bound to be replaced by market-oriented production; that is an inevitable trend. Companies will certainly come, step by step, to value the early work, and what we product managers need to do is prepare for it, stock up the necessary knowledge and skills, so that in the end we come when called, fight when we come, and win when we fight!
I will keep this brief; it is enough to know that product cycle > product life cycle. A product manager must understand not only how to sell a product well but also how to make a product well. We often say a product should be “marketable and on target,” but as I see it, it should really be “on target, then marketable,” because being “on target” is the premise, that is, making the product well, while “marketable” is the result, that is, selling the product well.
Understood this way it is even simpler: a product manager does nothing more than these two jobs well. But doing them well takes serious effort.
Product brand management
Ever since the financial crisis of ‘08 and the state’s call for industrial upgrading, media of every kind, along with many companies that used to do contract manufacturing, have been stressing one idea: take the road of building your own brand.
Having the idea is good. But from notion to practice to reaching the goal, have these companies steeled themselves for all the risks and costs along the way?
From the company’s angle, a brand is a symbol grounded in the medium of the product; from the user’s angle, a brand is the user’s emotional identification with the product. Just think how hard it is to turn a cold symbol into a value in the user’s mind.
But is building a brand really that simple?
Naturally not. Building a brand is nearly as difficult as planning a product.
Take the simplest task, designing the brand name. A name is not something you can just sit in the office and puzzle out; it likewise takes a great deal of analysis.
First you must determine your target users, because their characteristics shape how they perceive and accept your brand. For example, if your product’s target users are middle-aged and elderly people living in the countryside, then your brand name certainly must not be overly complicated or foreign-sounding; best is a name that fits rural culture, and it has to be simple, easy to grasp, and easy to spread.
Next, once the name is settled, you must also consider the matching logo, slogan, channels of communication, forms of communication, how to differentiate from competitors’ brands, and how to evaluate the brand’s effect after launch, and so on.
What work does this involve?
At the very least: market segmentation, target customer definition, competitive landscape analysis (at the brand level), product brand creative, differentiation analysis, marketing strategy formulation (at the brand level), promotion plan design, advertising design, communication channel design, and so on. And later brand maintenance is yet another major undertaking.
From this you can see that brand management is not simply designing a brand, producing an ad, and putting it in the media; it likewise needs a mass of meticulous work to hold it up.
Of course, the product manager cannot, and need not, do every item above personally; much of the work still requires the team’s cooperation. But in brand management the product manager should at the very least make clear to the company and the team:
(1) Who our brand is to reach
(2) How our brand can differ from competitors’
(3) What message our brand should carry to target users (quality? service? price? psychological satisfaction? self-realization?)
(4) How our brand can be delivered where it needs to go
(5) How to evaluate the brand’s communication effect
(6) How to protect our brand from harm
And this is only the work of bringing a new brand into the world. Managing an existing brand is no small job either. Say a new product is being launched: you must consider whether the existing product brand can support the new product’s growth. If it can, how should the existing brand be extended? If it cannot, does a new brand need to be designed from scratch? Moreover, if the company already has brands at multiple tiers, you must also consider what kind of relationship the extended or new brand should have with the brands at other tiers so that the relationship reinforces and harmonizes rather than interferes.
All of this belongs to the product manager’s brand management work.
Finally, why should the product manager do brand management at all?
It comes down to one point: making products is really managing the company’s resources, and the brand, as a corporate resource the product cannot do without (abroad, the brand exists as a strategic resource), naturally becomes an important aspect for us to watch over and manage well.
Comments